Agentic Search Boundary Review Checklist
A practical review checklist for deciding whether an Elastic-backed agentic workflow is actually safe enough for the next production step.
Use this before you let an Elastic-backed agent touch a workflow that matters.
The point is not to approve a clever demo. The point is to confirm that the retrieval path, tool boundary, and refusal behavior are strong enough to survive production review.
1. Retrieval boundary
- The workflow starts with retrieval, not action.
- The system can show which documents or snippets shaped the answer.
- The retrieved set is intentionally narrow rather than a giant context dump.
- Stale or lower-quality documents do not outrank the source of truth.
- Retrieval results can be explained after the fact with citations or trace output.
2. Tool registry
- The tool list is explicit in code or configuration.
- There is at least one read-only path that answers without mutation.
- Any write-capable tool is tightly scoped to one bounded action.
- The agent cannot discover new tools at runtime.
- The tool contract makes clear what the tool can return and what it cannot do.
3. Refusal and escalation behavior
- The system distinguishes between retrieval-only, search-plus-tool, and workflow-required requests.
- The system can ask for clarification instead of guessing.
- The system can refuse or escalate requests that imply live mutation.
- Draft creation is sandboxed and does not silently trigger external side effects.
- Workflow-required requests do not bypass the boundary just because the model sounds confident.
4. Access control and leakage checks
- Role-based filtering is applied before the final answer is assembled.
- A stronger restricted match cannot leak through a weaker visible fallback.
- Metadata lookups do not expose ownership or sensitivity for hidden documents.
- Restricted results leave an audit trail in notes or trace data without exposing the content itself.
- At least one test exists for contractor or lower-privilege access.
5. Trace and debugging
- Every request has a request ID.
- The trace shows the chosen route.
- The trace shows top retrieval hits.
- The trace shows tool name and tool outcome.
- The trace shows the final state such as answered, drafted, blocked, or needs clarification.
- Latency and failure notes are visible somewhere an operator can inspect them.
6. Definition of done
You are in decent shape when all of these are true:
- A retrieval-only request returns a grounded answer with citations.
- A search-plus-tool request uses only an allow-listed tool.
- A workflow-style request is blocked, escalated, or sandboxed instead of executed live.
- A lower-privilege user does not get a misleading fallback answer for a stronger restricted match.
- A reviewer can read one trace and explain what happened.
Signoff
Before release or internal rollout, record:
Boundary-reviewed, traceable, and safe enough for the next stage of testing.
- Owner:
- Second reviewer:
- Date: